翻訳と辞書 |
Scally v Southern Health and Social Services Board : ウィキペディア英語版 | Scally v Southern Health and Social Services Board
''Scally v Southern Health and Social Services Board'' () 1 AC 294 is an English contract law case, relevant for pensions and UK labour law, concerning implied terms. ==Facts== Dr Scally and three other doctors were employees of the Southern Health and Social Services Board in Northern Ireland. They had not worked the requisite 40 years before retirement to get full superannuation (or pension) benefits. But by law〔Health Services (Superannuation) (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1974〕 they could "top up" their payments within twelve months of beginning their jobs and get the full entitlements. Their employer did not tell them this. So they failed to get better rates. Reynold QC, counsel for the employees, argued a ‘necessary’ term of employment was information about exercising rights under the superannuation scheme.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Scally v Southern Health and Social Services Board」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|